While Microsoft To Do provided the same functionality for me, I was constantly bumping up against features I had no use for and working through interface elements that just slowed me down. While Google's lack of complexity might mean its options fall short for some advanced users, Microsoft's attempt to exceed expectations backfires as often as not.ĭuring my time testing both apps, I continually felt like Tasks gave me the freedom to create a surprisingly comprehensive set of reminders and lists across my personal and work calendars. Meanwhile, Microsoft attempts to go above and beyond what the average user might need. At every turn, Google Tasks provides a minimalistic framework to give users just enough functionality to manage their tasks. This initial comparison informs just about every aspect of the user experience for both apps.
#Google tasks app series
Microsoft chose to immediately present new users with a long series of automatically curated lists, while Google Tasks says hello to newbies with an almost completely blank slate. However, Microsoft's slightly wider variety of widget size options, and the fact that you can add a new task from any one of them, regardless of their size, gives it the edge here.Īs I mentioned in the intro, Google Tasks and Microsoft To Do take very different approaches to introducing their functionality to new users. Microsoft, meanwhile, includes four widgets: a 2x2 version that lists tasks from the "My Day" screen a 2x2 version similar to Google's smaller offering, but with support for one-tap access to new task creation a 4x2 version that lets you see longer titles, mark individual tasks as completed, and add new tasks and a screen-filling version that does essentially all of the same things as the previous widget, but takes up far more screen real estate.īoth companies' widgets include options that let you choose which of your task lists a widget displays, meaning you can have multiple widgets for multiple lists. Google has two variations: a small 2x2 version that provides a truncated view of your top tasks, with one-tap access to opening the app and a larger 4x2 list that provides quick access to individual tasks, as well as an included button for adding new tasks.
#Google tasks app android
Michael Gariffo Widgetsīoth apps support a selection of widgets that are largely identical across their Android and iOS deployments. Three of Microsoft's four available To Do widgets (left) and both of Google's available Tasks widgets (right). So, with that in mind, let's decide whether Microsoft To Do or Google Tasks is the best option for most users by pitting them against each other in a head-to-head comparison of availability, cost, external service integrations, widgets, functionality, and ease of use. Of course, it's unlikely any single implementation of a to-do list manager will be perfect for everyone. Microsoft To Do review: A to-do list app that makes you do too much.Google Tasks review: This simple to-do list app gets the job done.If you'd like to take a deeper dive into the specifics of each, take a look at our coverage linked below. We've reviewed both Google Tasks and Microsoft To Do already, highlighting the pros and cons of each application.
The execution of these parallel goals rapidly diverges upon actual use of either company's app, showing different priorities, apparent target demographics, and levels of cohesive design. While Google opted for a barebones, laser-focused application centered on giving individual users maximum control, Microsoft attempted to take the genre further and add some collaboration into the mix.
#Google tasks app software
Two of the biggest names in operating systems and software have both released their take on the ideal to-do list app.
0 kommentar(er)
